I find myself upset at the pouring out of support and financial gifts given recently to Nadya Suleman A.K.A “The Octomom”. Why is it that we should feel sorry for or worse, guilded into providing for a mother of 14 who incesently throws her mis-happed pregnancy in our face.

The news of a recent Trademark filing has shown her knack for cashing in on every thinkable way to persuade any “Takers” her way. In the application for Trademark she cites to promote the name “Octomom” on dresses, pants, shirts, and baby products. In a 2nd filing Nadya Suleman also cites using the name for variety TV shows. The nickname stuck after Tabloids started monitoring the pregnancy and publishing questionable details of her life. The January 26th 2009 pregnancy drew public attention worldwide.

In my opinion those children would have been better off living independent lives, cared for by foster parents. “The Rage” would not necessarily promote splitting up families based on monetary gain but considers the lifestyle of Nadya Suleman unsuitable for raising children. Lately, reports of her daily habits show she is more interested in making money and working out than raising these children herself. A need to feed the plastic surgery machine. Taking these points as well as the past into account, separation seems prudent. It would at least show a better use of tax money other than support for her future earnings.

I think the California tax payers are due a refund and should have come out more strongly against the state for there mis-guided handling of the situation. California residents “demand your money back” or better yet have the state take action against the Trademark application. Octomom? How about OctoWHAT? It rages me! How about you?

Related posts:

1. Innocent In Vitro ?
2. Jon and Kate