Oh, make it stop! Jon and Kate are apparently about as smug a fake couple as they come. Two individuals on TV arguing about life and erroneous behaviors surrounded by children. I am so sick of reality airings about fat people, celebrity rehab and reality couples I could vomit. I do NOT watch this show and do NOT have to based on what I hear and read.

Normally I look forward to listening to my morning radio show program that sponsors news and celebrity gossip according to who’s who and what’s new in their lives. For the last several days however its been covered up with the latest on Jon and Kate. Who cares about this couple and what makes them important anyway? They came from nothing, are nothing and will continue to be nothing but rich overpaid celebrity wannabees. It is fact you could take any couple in America, put a camera in there life and as long as they have children and argue or mutter “divorce” they too would become rich and famous. (continue reading…)

Ok, so Carrie Prejean prefers marriage over gay marriage and releases some somewhat topless swimwear photos. This makes national news, why? It makes news because Donald Trump let’s Miss California keep her crown is why. I get somewhat amazed when people quote “This is the 21st Century” with inuendo making it OK to follow a fad or change a defining principle. Donald Trump is in it to get noticed, create controversy and define his own socialistic behavior for the country. However this is not a RAGE against Donald Trump but one against the definition of immoral behaviors in our society.

Immoral behaviors are defined by social groups abroad with hundreds of thousands to millions of voices. The bigger the group, the bigger the voice. The largest being the religious sector. Religious groups have the bible or many versions of it to back them. Other groups are built on opinion and social commentary. News associate’s abroad feed off the opinion of large social sectors and release the combined opinion of two parties. Immoral behaviors and the belief’s attached are a combination of centuries of opinion.

Where’s the fact you say? The fact lies with the strongest opinion held closest to you created by the strongest voice heard. Think about it for a second. Religious groups consistently quote the bible as the true word for defining immoral behavior while reading and reviewing Sunday scripture. Others practice various blood rituals in sanctification to there leader. Everyone follows there initial mentors viewpoint and then make a social decision to follow a stronger opinion or sustain a path based on the roots provided.

My point is this. Simply defining an immoral behavior as “bad” does not necessarily negate the fact that its affect on many lives is felt everywhere.  If Carrie Prejean was put in an awkward position to make racy photos it was up to her to walk away and decide what affect, if any it would have on her representation of California.  She like many others held the opinion “hey, it’s the 21st century” making it an acceptable social behavior for herself.  The decision to stay or walk away would not have made a difference and has not made one either way.  Carrie has her crown and we all have our own beliefs and opinions.  What was gained?

Yes I am RAGED today.  How about you?  Leave a comment or opinion.

Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio have given cash to help pay the nursing home fees of the last survivor of the Titanic. The Hollywood stars – who made their international names in the 1997 film about the sinking of the liner – were approached by a charity to help 97-year-old Millvina Dean, and the movie’s director James Cameron has also made a donation.

It’s believed the trio have donated 30,000 U.S. dollars (”22,000) to help Miss Dean, who was nine-weeks-old when the liner sank in April 1912. Miss Dean – who is from the New Forest, Hampshire – has been living at a nursing home for a few years and last month she auctioned personal belongings and memorabilia associated with the disaster to help pay for the ”3,000-a-month cost of her care.

The campaign called the Millvina Fund was launched in Belfast today (Monday May 11), where the liner was built, and it will help secure her future. In a joint statement, the stars said: “Our hope is that others will feel inspired by Millvina Dean’s remarkable story of survival, and hope she can rest easier in knowing that her future will become more secure through this fund.” Irish author Don Mullan, a friend of Miss Dean, approached the stars to lend their support. He’s also produced a limited edition photograph depicting Millvina signing a card for an autograph collector, which are selling for 500 euro (”440) with all proceeds going towards the Millvina Fund. He’s also keen to enlist the support of Celine Dion, who sang the theme tune from Titanic.

It rages me! How about you? Comment on your Rage.

I find myself upset at the pouring out of support and financial gifts given recently to Nadya Suleman A.K.A “The Octomom”. Why is it that we should feel sorry for or worse, guilded into providing for a mother of 14 who incesently throws her mis-happed pregnancy in our face.

The news of a recent Trademark filing has shown her knack for cashing in on every thinkable way to persuade any “Takers” her way. In the application for Trademark she cites to promote the name “Octomom” on dresses, pants, shirts, and baby products. In a 2nd filing Nadya Suleman also cites using the name for variety TV shows. The nickname stuck after Tabloids started monitoring the pregnancy and publishing questionable details of her life. The January 26th 2009 pregnancy drew public attention worldwide.

In my opinion those children would have been better off living independent lives, cared for by foster parents. “The Rage” would not necessarily promote splitting up families based on monetary gain but considers the lifestyle of Nadya Suleman unsuitable for raising children. Lately, reports of her daily habits show she is more interested in making money and working out than raising these children herself. A need to feed the plastic surgery machine. Taking these points as well as the past into account, separation seems prudent. It would at least show a better use of tax money other than support for her future earnings.

I think the California tax payers are due a refund and should have come out more strongly against the state for there mis-guided handling of the situation. California residents “demand your money back” or better yet have the state take action against the Trademark application. Octomom? How about OctoWHAT? It rages me! How about you?