Oh, make it stop! Jon and Kate are apparently about as smug a fake couple as they come. Two individuals on TV arguing about life and erroneous behaviors surrounded by children. I am so sick of reality airings about fat people, celebrity rehab and reality couples I could vomit. I do NOT watch this show and do NOT have to based on what I hear and read.

Normally I look forward to listening to my morning radio show program that sponsors news and celebrity gossip according to who’s who and what’s new in their lives. For the last several days however its been covered up with the latest on Jon and Kate. Who cares about this couple and what makes them important anyway? They came from nothing, are nothing and will continue to be nothing but rich overpaid celebrity wannabees. It is fact you could take any couple in America, put a camera in there life and as long as they have children and argue or mutter “divorce” they too would become rich and famous. (continue reading…)

Have Money, Success and no time for children during the younger years? Solution: Buy one!

Here we go again as I stated last month. An irresponsible mother seeking IVF treatments reaching an irrevocable path. Dr’s and experts alike agree that the outcome could prove to be dangerous.  Hopefully the mother will live another 20-30 years for the child and the child will not grow up depressed and vengeful of her decision.  It’s not up to me, I just seek rationality.

I have to admit people’s private lives are there own to live but when it affects an innocent child I cannot find an understanding! When does it become right for another to decide a young ones fate or future? Who gets to shift life’s balance once its provided out of a natural state. The Doctors and IVF’s clinic’s certainly do not.

I understand In Vitro Fertilization can correct certain medical conditions but a moralistic approach should be taken and understood. The technology should not out rule society’s dilemma.

I know how Raged I feel.  How about you?  Send a private email to “RAGE” if commenting publicly concerns you.

Courtesy of BBC News UK

A businesswoman who at 66 is to become Britain’s oldest mother says she does not have to defend her decision.

Elizabeth Adeney, of Lidgate, Suffolk, is eight months’ pregnant after undergoing IVF treatment in Ukraine, according to the Sunday Mirror.

She told the paper her age was not important, claiming it is “how I feel inside” that matters.

Ms Adeney said she felt as young as 39 at times and was fitter than some of her younger employees.

(continue reading…)

Ok, so Carrie Prejean prefers marriage over gay marriage and releases some somewhat topless swimwear photos. This makes national news, why? It makes news because Donald Trump let’s Miss California keep her crown is why. I get somewhat amazed when people quote “This is the 21st Century” with inuendo making it OK to follow a fad or change a defining principle. Donald Trump is in it to get noticed, create controversy and define his own socialistic behavior for the country. However this is not a RAGE against Donald Trump but one against the definition of immoral behaviors in our society.

Immoral behaviors are defined by social groups abroad with hundreds of thousands to millions of voices. The bigger the group, the bigger the voice. The largest being the religious sector. Religious groups have the bible or many versions of it to back them. Other groups are built on opinion and social commentary. News associate’s abroad feed off the opinion of large social sectors and release the combined opinion of two parties. Immoral behaviors and the belief’s attached are a combination of centuries of opinion.

Where’s the fact you say? The fact lies with the strongest opinion held closest to you created by the strongest voice heard. Think about it for a second. Religious groups consistently quote the bible as the true word for defining immoral behavior while reading and reviewing Sunday scripture. Others practice various blood rituals in sanctification to there leader. Everyone follows there initial mentors viewpoint and then make a social decision to follow a stronger opinion or sustain a path based on the roots provided.

My point is this. Simply defining an immoral behavior as “bad” does not necessarily negate the fact that its affect on many lives is felt everywhere.  If Carrie Prejean was put in an awkward position to make racy photos it was up to her to walk away and decide what affect, if any it would have on her representation of California.  She like many others held the opinion “hey, it’s the 21st century” making it an acceptable social behavior for herself.  The decision to stay or walk away would not have made a difference and has not made one either way.  Carrie has her crown and we all have our own beliefs and opinions.  What was gained?

Yes I am RAGED today.  How about you?  Leave a comment or opinion.