Oh, make it stop! Jon and Kate are apparently about as smug a fake couple as they come. Two individuals on TV arguing about life and erroneous behaviors surrounded by children. I am so sick of reality airings about fat people, celebrity rehab and reality couples I could vomit. I do NOT watch this show and do NOT have to based on what I hear and read.

Normally I look forward to listening to my morning radio show program that sponsors news and celebrity gossip according to who’s who and what’s new in their lives. For the last several days however its been covered up with the latest on Jon and Kate. Who cares about this couple and what makes them important anyway? They came from nothing, are nothing and will continue to be nothing but rich overpaid celebrity wannabees. It is fact you could take any couple in America, put a camera in there life and as long as they have children and argue or mutter “divorce” they too would become rich and famous.

Its been reported that almost 10 million people tuned into the season 5 premiere on Monday night, May 25th.  Ten million people viewing the High Heeled idiot Kate and her broken down depressed husband Jon. Its no wonder he is found in bars at 2am with a 23-year old blonde elementary teacher.  Jon is probably looking for a release he can’t seem to find with Kate.

The following article quote by Dadcentric has the best solution in my opinion:

“It is up to us, as fellow parents, to make it happen. We must stop being their enablers.

No more tuning into watch the train wreck. No buying (or even viewing for free online) the tabloids that are following their every move and whine. Avoid all books written by or about these people (Kate is currently pushing some cheesy photo album of the kids and seems to have a cookbook on tap for October). And, for God’s sake, if you see Jon hanging in a bar at 2 a.m. with some hot young thing, smack him upside the head and tell him to get back to the bed he’s made at home and deal with it.”

I could not agree more. Stop watching, stop thinking and certainly stop funding these idiots. Take away the camera, hope they get counseling and let’s all get back to what’s important in our own lives. I hope all will cease watching shallow, egotistical people on TV in hopes of improving there own lives. It won’t happen and certainly not by putting time, effort and conversation into a reality show like Jon and Kate.

It Rages me!! How about you? Leave a comment or send an email to “”The RAGE“

Related posts:

1. Americas Moral Mind
2. Octomom ?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Have Money, Success and no time for children during the younger years? Solution: Buy one!

Here we go again as I stated last month. An irresponsible mother seeking IVF treatments reaching an irrevocable path. Dr’s and experts alike agree that the outcome could prove to be dangerous.  Hopefully the mother will live another 20-30 years for the child and the child will not grow up depressed and vengeful of her decision.  It’s not up to me, I just seek rationality.

I have to admit people’s private lives are there own to live but when it affects an innocent child I cannot find an understanding! When does it become right for another to decide a young ones fate or future? Who gets to shift life’s balance once its provided out of a natural state. The Doctors and IVF’s clinic’s certainly do not.

I understand In Vitro Fertilization can correct certain medical conditions but a moralistic approach should be taken and understood. The technology should not out rule society’s dilemma.

I know how Raged I feel.  How about you?  Send a private email to “RAGE” if commenting publicly concerns you.

Courtesy of BBC News UK

A businesswoman who at 66 is to become Britain’s oldest mother says she does not have to defend her decision.

Elizabeth Adeney, of Lidgate, Suffolk, is eight months’ pregnant after undergoing IVF treatment in Ukraine, according to the Sunday Mirror.

She told the paper her age was not important, claiming it is “how I feel inside” that matters.

Ms Adeney said she felt as young as 39 at times and was fitter than some of her younger employees.

“It doesn’t interest me that I’m going to be the oldest mum in the country,” she told the paper, before revealing she planned to give birth at a clinic in Cambridge.

Most British clinics will not offer IVF treatment to women over the age of 50.

Ms Adeney, who runs a manufacturing business near her home and will be 67 in July, said: “I have young girls working for me in my factory and I’m fitter than half of them.

“I don’t have to defend what I’ve done. It’s between me, my baby and no-one else.”

Professor Severino Antinori, who helped 62-year-old Briton Patricia Rashbrook give birth three years ago, said he was shocked at the prospect of Ms Adeney having a child.

“I respect the choice medically but I think anything over 63 is risky because you cannot guarantee the child will have a loving mother or family,” he told The Sunday Times.

However, Dr Gillian Lockwood told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme that improved life expectancy meant a healthy woman of 66 would probably live another 20 or 30 years.

Using donor eggs from a younger woman reduced the risks of miscarriage or abnormalities to the child, said Dr Lockwood, of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecology.

She said it would be “unfair” to discriminate on ground of age alone, adding: “We don’t prevent much younger women with serious health problems getting pregnant… even though they run much higher risks.”

Related posts:

1. Octomom ?

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Ok, so Carrie Prejean prefers marriage over gay marriage and releases some somewhat topless swimwear photos. This makes national news, why? It makes news because Donald Trump let’s Miss California keep her crown is why. I get somewhat amazed when people quote “This is the 21st Century” with inuendo making it OK to follow a fad or change a defining principle. Donald Trump is in it to get noticed, create controversy and define his own socialistic behavior for the country. However this is not a RAGE against Donald Trump but one against the definition of immoral behaviors in our society.

Immoral behaviors are defined by social groups abroad with hundreds of thousands to millions of voices. The bigger the group, the bigger the voice. The largest being the religious sector. Religious groups have the bible or many versions of it to back them. Other groups are built on opinion and social commentary. News associate’s abroad feed off the opinion of large social sectors and release the combined opinion of two parties. Immoral behaviors and the belief’s attached are a combination of centuries of opinion.

Where’s the fact you say? The fact lies with the strongest opinion held closest to you created by the strongest voice heard. Think about it for a second. Religious groups consistently quote the bible as the true word for defining immoral behavior while reading and reviewing Sunday scripture. Others practice various blood rituals in sanctification to there leader. Everyone follows there initial mentors viewpoint and then make a social decision to follow a stronger opinion or sustain a path based on the roots provided.

My point is this. Simply defining an immoral behavior as “bad” does not necessarily negate the fact that its affect on many lives is felt everywhere.  If Carrie Prejean was put in an awkward position to make racy photos it was up to her to walk away and decide what affect, if any it would have on her representation of California.  She like many others held the opinion “hey, it’s the 21st century” making it an acceptable social behavior for herself.  The decision to stay or walk away would not have made a difference and has not made one either way.  Carrie has her crown and we all have our own beliefs and opinions.  What was gained?

Yes I am RAGED today.  How about you?  Leave a comment or opinion.

Related posts:

1. Jon and Kate

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.